IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v28y1998i4p31-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Easy Chair: Judging Effectiveness of Work in OR/MS Practice and Claiming Credit for Its Consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Hugh J. Miser

    (199 South Road, Farmington, Connecticut 06032)

Abstract

Discussion of the “practical credentials” of the OR/MS work and what it is that constitutes quality and effectiveness in OR/MS practice as seen by our profession, and especially by its large and growing academic community. The matter of scientific quality is left aside, as the supporting material for the cases offers ample evidence of their excellence.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugh J. Miser, 1998. "The Easy Chair: Judging Effectiveness of Work in OR/MS Practice and Claiming Credit for Its Consequences," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 31-37, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:28:y:1998:i:4:p:31-37
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.28.4.31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.28.4.31
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.28.4.31?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hugh J. Miser, 1989. "The Easy Chair: Observation and Experimentation," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 19(5), pages 23-30, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frederic H. Murphy, 2005. "ASP, The Art and Science of Practice: Elements of a Theory of the Practice of Operations Research: Practice as a Business," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(6), pages 524-530, December.
    2. Hugh J. Miser, 1998. "The Easy Chair: What Kinds of Papers Will Contribute to a Well-Rounded View of the Conditions and Craft of OR/MS Practice?," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 63-70, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      professional; comments on;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:28:y:1998:i:4:p:31-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.