IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v26y1996i6p3-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sawtimber Valuation and Sawlog Allocation Through Simulation of Temple-Inland Sawmills

Author

Listed:
  • Francis G. Wagner

    (Forest Products Department, College of Forestry, Wildlife, and Range Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1132)

  • James A. Brody

    (Temple-Inland Forest Products Building Products Division Diboll, Texas 76941)

  • Douglas S. Ladd

    (Decision Consultants, Inc., 5511 Capitol Center Drive, Suite P130, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606)

  • Joe S. Beard

    (Temple-Inland Forest Products, Building Products Division, Diboll, Texas 76941)

Abstract

The cost of delivered sawlogs to a sawmill may account for 70 to 80 percent of all operating costs. Therefore, accurate valuation of standing sawtimber and proper allocation of sawlogs are critical to a sawmill's long-term profitability. Sawmills differ, including the four southern-pine sawmills operated by Temple-Inland Forest Products in east Texas and southwest Louisiana. As a result, one sawmill may process a certain group of sawlogs more efficiently and obtain a higher value from those sawlogs than another group. To determine sawtimber value and to allocate sawlogs to sawmills, Temple-Inland Forest Products has employed a simulation program (Micro-MSUSP) since 1991. During 1994, Temple-Inland Forest Products sawmills processed sawtimber worth $154 million, and analysis showed an approximate 3.3 percent ($5 million) improvement in profit margin through improved valuation of sawtimber and better allocation of sawlogs. Temple-Inland's investment in simulation has amounted to two full-time employees and approximately $95,000 each year.

Suggested Citation

  • Francis G. Wagner & James A. Brody & Douglas S. Ladd & Joe S. Beard, 1996. "Sawtimber Valuation and Sawlog Allocation Through Simulation of Temple-Inland Sawmills," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 3-8, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:26:y:1996:i:6:p:3-8
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.26.6.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.26.6.3
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.26.6.3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ray R. Hashemi & Louis A. Le Blanc, 2000. "Resource Allocation through Negotiation and Compromise: A Database Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 325-345, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:26:y:1996:i:6:p:3-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.