IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v10y1980i1p1-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use of Management Science to Support a Multimillion Dollar Precedent-Setting Government Contract Litigation

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Nahmias

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, 1048 Benedum Hall, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261)

Abstract

This paper describes the analysis of relevant data presented by this writer at a hearing conducted before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals involving an appeal of the Ingalls Shipbuilding Division of Litton Industries. The appeal concerned contracts awarded to Litton by the U.S. Navy to build four nuclear submarines and the subsequent impact of changes and delays to these contracts on other shipyard operations. Behind this appeal is the fundamental question of whether or not the government is required to assume liability and reimburse the contractor for additional costs incurred due to “ripple effects” of contract changes on other shipyard operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Nahmias, 1980. "The Use of Management Science to Support a Multimillion Dollar Precedent-Setting Government Contract Litigation," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:10:y:1980:i:1:p:1-12
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.10.1.1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.10.1.1
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.10.1.1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fran Ackermann & Colin Eden, 2005. "Using Causal Mapping with Group Support Systems to Elicit an Understanding of Failure in Complex Projects: Some Implications for Organizational Research," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 355-376, September.
    2. Howick, Susan, 2005. "Using system dynamics models with litigation audiences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(1), pages 239-250, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:10:y:1980:i:1:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.