IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijds/v4y2025i1p67-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fair Collaborative Learning (FairCL): A Method to Improve Fairness amid Personalization

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Lin

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195)

  • Chaoyue Zhao

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195)

  • Xiaoning Qian

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843)

  • Kendra Vehik

    (Health Informatics Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620)

  • Shuai Huang

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195)

Abstract

Model personalization has attracted widespread attention in recent years. In an ideal situation, if individuals’ data are sufficient, model personalization can be realized by building models separately for different individuals using their own data. But, in reality, individuals often have data sets of varying sizes and qualities. To overcome this disparity, collaborative learning has emerged as a generic strategy for model personalization, but there is no mechanism to ensure fairness in this framework. In this paper, we develop fair collaborative learning (FairCL) that could potentially integrate a variety of fairness concepts. We further focus on two specific fairness metrics, the bounded individual loss and individual fairness, and develop a self-adaptive algorithm for FairCL and conduct both simulated and real-world case studies. Our study reveals that model fairness and accuracy could be improved simultaneously in the context of model personalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Lin & Chaoyue Zhao & Xiaoning Qian & Kendra Vehik & Shuai Huang, 2025. "Fair Collaborative Learning (FairCL): A Method to Improve Fairness amid Personalization," INFORMS Joural on Data Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 67-84, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijds:v:4:y:2025:i:1:p:67-84
    DOI: 10.1287/ijds.2024.0029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijds.2024.0029
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijds.2024.0029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijds:v:4:y:2025:i:1:p:67-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.