IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/imx/journl/v3y2004i1p45-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Application Of Gibbons-Ross-Shanken'S Test Of The Efficiency Of A Given Portfolio

Author

Listed:
  • Eneas A. Caldiño García

    (El Colegio de México A. C.)

Abstract

En este artículo se adaptan las pruebas estadísticas de Gibbons, Ross, y Shanken (1989) para probar la eficiencia de un portafolio en dos casos en los que sus pruebas no pueden usarse directamente: 1) Cuando el portafolio cuya eficiencia está siendo probada no está incluído en el conjunto de instrumentos financieros que generan la frontera de media-desviación estándard y, 2) Cuando se prueba la existencia de un portafolio eficiente (de un conjunto dado de L portafolios), cuando ninguno de estos L portafolios está incluído en el conjunto de instrumentos financieros que generan la frontera de media-desviación estándard. Nuestros estadísticos pueden usarse para probar la eficiencia de fondos de inversión.

Suggested Citation

  • Eneas A. Caldiño García, 2004. "An Application Of Gibbons-Ross-Shanken'S Test Of The Efficiency Of A Given Portfolio," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 3(1), pages 45-53, Marzo 200.
    • Handle: RePEc:imx:journl:v:3:y:2004:i:1:p:45-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.remef.org.mx/index.php/primera/article/view/161
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shanken, Jay, 1986. "Testing Portfolio Efficiency When the Zero-Beta Rate Is Unknown: A Note," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 41(1), pages 269-276, March.
    2. Chamberlain, Gary, 1983. "Funds, Factors, and Diversification in Arbitrage Pricing Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 51(5), pages 1305-1323, September.
    3. Connor, Gregory & Korajczyk, Robert A., 1988. "Risk and return in an equilibrium APT : Application of a new test methodology," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 255-289, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sentana, Enrique, 2004. "Factor representing portfolios in large asset markets," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 257-289, April.
    2. Forni, Mario & Gambetti, Luca, 2010. "The dynamic effects of monetary policy: A structural factor model approach," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 203-216, March.
    3. Forni, Mario & Giannone, Domenico & Lippi, Marco & Reichlin, Lucrezia, 2009. "Opening The Black Box: Structural Factor Models With Large Cross Sections," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(5), pages 1319-1347, October.
    4. Lo, Andrew W. & Mackinlay, A. Craig, 1997. "Maximizing Predictability In The Stock And Bond Markets," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 102-134, January.
    5. Bodnar, Taras & Reiß, Markus, 2016. "Exact and asymptotic tests on a factor model in low and large dimensions with applications," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 125-151.
    6. Lo, Andrew W & MacKinlay, A Craig, 1990. "Data-Snooping Biases in Tests of Financial Asset Pricing Models," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 3(3), pages 431-467.
    7. Enrique Sentana, 2009. "The econometrics of mean-variance efficiency tests: a survey," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 12(3), pages 65-101, November.
    8. Martijn Cremers & Jianping Mei, 2004. "Turning Over Turnover," Yale School of Management Working Papers ysm429, Yale School of Management, revised 01 May 2008.
    9. Reichlin, Lucrezia, 2002. "Factor Models in Large Cross-Sections of Time Series," CEPR Discussion Papers 3285, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Enrique Sentana, 1993. "The econometrics of the stock market II: asset pricing," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 17(3), pages 421-444, September.
    11. Erdinc Altay, 2003. "The Effect of Macroeconomic Factors on Asset Returns: A Comparative Analysis of the German and the Turkish Stock Markets in an APT Framework," Finance 0307006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Sangwon Suh & Wonho Song & Bong-Soo Lee, 2014. "A new method for forming asset pricing factors from firm characteristics," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(28), pages 3463-3482, October.
    13. Chen, Kim Heng & Jandhyala, Venkata K. & Fotopoulos, Stergios B., 2005. "Nonlinear Properties of Multifactor Financial Models," Review of Applied Economics, Lincoln University, Department of Financial and Business Systems, vol. 1(2), pages 1-27.
    14. Seung C. Ahn & Alex R. Horenstein, 2017. "Asset Pricing and Excess Returns over the Market Return," Working Papers 2017-12, University of Miami, Department of Economics.
    15. Jones, Christopher S., 2001. "Extracting factors from heteroskedastic asset returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 293-325, November.
    16. Mario Forni & Luca Gambetti, 2021. "Policy and Business Cycle Shocks: A Structural Factor Model Representation of the US Economy," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Kim, Hyun Hak & Swanson, Norman R., 2018. "Mining big data using parsimonious factor, machine learning, variable selection and shrinkage methods," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 339-354.
    18. Maysam Khodayari Gharanchaei & Prabhu Prasad Panda & Xilin Chen, 2024. "Quantitative Investment Diversification Strategies via Various Risk Models," Papers 2407.01550, arXiv.org.
    19. Catherine Doz & Domenico Giannone & Lucrezia Reichlin, 2012. "A Quasi–Maximum Likelihood Approach for Large, Approximate Dynamic Factor Models," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 94(4), pages 1014-1024, November.
    20. Norman R. Swanson & Nii Ayi Armah, 2011. "Diffusion Index Models and Index Proxies: Recent Results and New Directions," Departmental Working Papers 201114, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Portfolio Choice; Information and Market Efficiency;

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:imx:journl:v:3:y:2004:i:1:p:45-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ricardo Mendoza (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.remef.org.mx/index.php/remef/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.