IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/rmj000/v28y2015i4p38-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions during Technology Transition: The Role of User Involvement, Core Self-Evaluations, and Computer Self-Efficacy

Author

Listed:
  • Richard D. Johnson

    (Department of Management, University at Albany, Albany, NY, USA)

  • Regina Yanson

    (Francis Marion University, Florence, SC, USA)

Abstract

Using data from 52 employees, this study investigated the relations among user involvement, core self-evaluations, computer self-efficacy, employee stress, job satisfaction, and intention to leave the organization during the implementation of a new barcode scanning system. The results revealed that core self-evaluations and user involvement were positively related to computer self-efficacy. In addition, core self-evaluations was negatively related to job stress, but user involvement was not. The results further showed that job stress was negatively related to job satisfaction. Finally, job stress and job satisfaction were each negatively related to intentions to leave the organization. Implications for theory and managers are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard D. Johnson & Regina Yanson, 2015. "Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions during Technology Transition: The Role of User Involvement, Core Self-Evaluations, and Computer Self-Efficacy," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 28(4), pages 38-51, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:rmj000:v:28:y:2015:i:4:p:38-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IRMJ.2015100103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A. Reeves & P. Delfabbro & D. Calic, 2021. "Encouraging Employee Engagement With Cybersecurity: How to Tackle Cyber Fatigue," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:rmj000:v:28:y:2015:i:4:p:38-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.