IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jwsr00/v8y2011i1p41-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Utilizing Web Service Equivalence for Supporting the Composition Life Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Stefanie Rinderle-Ma

    (University of Vienna, Austria)

  • Manfred Reichert

    (University of Ulm, Germany)

  • Martin Jurisch

    (Flow GmbH, Germany)

Abstract

Deciding on Web service equivalence in process-aware service compositions is a crucial challenge throughout the composition life cycle. However, restricting such decisions to (activity) label equivalence is not sufficient for many practical applications: if two activities and Web services respectively have equivalent labels, does this necessarily mean they are equivalent as well? In many scenarios (e.g., evolution of a composition schema or mining of completed composition instances), other factors also play an important role. Examples include context information (e.g., input and output messages) and information on the position of Web services within compositions. In this paper, the authors introduce the whole composition life cycle and discuss specific requirements for Web service equivalence along its different phases. The authors define adequate equivalence notions for the design, execution, analysis, and evolution of service compositions. This paper focuses on attribute and position equivalence and contributes a new understanding and treatment of equivalence notions in service compositions.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefanie Rinderle-Ma & Manfred Reichert & Martin Jurisch, 2011. "On Utilizing Web Service Equivalence for Supporting the Composition Life Cycle," International Journal of Web Services Research (IJWSR), IGI Global, vol. 8(1), pages 41-67, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jwsr00:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p:41-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jwsr.2011010103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jwsr00:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p:41-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.