IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jwltt0/v7y2012i2p51-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Sharing Portal Evaluation: An Extended Analysis of Knowledge Seekers’ and Experts’ Feedback

Author

Listed:
  • D. Venkata Subramanian

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, B.S. Abdur Rahman University, Chennai, India)

  • Angelina Geetha

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, B.S. Abdur Rahman University, Chennai, India)

  • Senthil Raja

    (Virtusa (India) Private Limited, Chennai, India)

Abstract

A knowledge management (KM) system plays a crucial role in every industry as well as in higher learning institutions. The purpose of this case study is to better understand the relationships between the knowledge seekers and expert’s feedback when evaluating, knowledge portals. One of the primary goals of this case study is to analyze the data collected from the database technology professionals (knowledge seekers), who access a series of database technology articles in the knowledge sharing portal to enhance their skills. This study also analyzes the data from the database technology experts, for validation, and performs the correlation between the evaluation results of knowledge providers and seekers. In addition, this paper tries to identify the correlation between the feedback data collected from knowledge seekers and providers. This study also describes an evaluation methodology involving both knowledge seekers and providers, with an emphasis on the key evaluation factors and supporting factors, as an effective approach to evaluate the knowledge sharing portal.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Venkata Subramanian & Angelina Geetha & Senthil Raja, 2012. "Knowledge Sharing Portal Evaluation: An Extended Analysis of Knowledge Seekers’ and Experts’ Feedback," International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), IGI Global, vol. 7(2), pages 51-66, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jwltt0:v:7:y:2012:i:2:p:51-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jwltt.2012040105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jwltt0:v:7:y:2012:i:2:p:51-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.