IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jwltt0/v15y2020i3p60-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative Assessment Approaches and Quality Product Design Within Web-Based Learning Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Ahlam Mohammed Al-Abdullatif

    (King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to identify the impact of the alternative web-based self and peer assessment approaches on improving the quality of student educational projects. In this context, a study was carried out during the second semester of the 2017-2018 academic year among 48 postgraduate students at King Faisal University. Results indicated that both self and peer-assessment approaches are effective when assessing the quality of educational products. The results also showed that the extent of student experience with the self-assessment approach affects their assessment credibility and objectivity. This study emphasized the value of utilizing alternative assessment approaches in web-based learning environments as means of improving student performance, particularly when designing educational products. It may have theoretical and pedagogical implications for learners and teachers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahlam Mohammed Al-Abdullatif, 2020. "Alternative Assessment Approaches and Quality Product Design Within Web-Based Learning Environments," International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), IGI Global, vol. 15(3), pages 60-74, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jwltt0:v:15:y:2020:i:3:p:60-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJWLTT.20200701.oa1
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yara Ahmed Mohebeldin Zaky & Azza Ali Gameil, 2024. "Exploring the Use of Avatars in the Sustainable Edu-Metaverse for an Alternative Assessment: Impact on Tolerance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jwltt0:v:15:y:2020:i:3:p:60-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.