IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jthi00/v7y2011i2p28-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Case Study of Indonesian and UK Organisational Culture Differences in IS Project Management

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew McDonald

    (Birkbeck, University of London, UK)

  • Sven Helmer

    (Birkbeck, University of London, UK)

Abstract

Information Systems (IS) Project Management (PM) is fundamental to the modern, constantly changing and upgrading business world and is impacted by culture on many levels. This research shows the extent to which organisational culture in international IS projects is impacted by culture found on a national level. Current data contributing to IS PM knowledge is provided by investigating two Information Technology (IT) firms in the telecommunications sector based in Indonesia and the United Kingdom undergoing system upgrade projects using a survey and interviews. Differing trends between these organisational cultures are identified (and a third international control group) in regard to hierarchical structures and managing conflict employing a version of Hofstede’s cultural survey as a basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew McDonald & Sven Helmer, 2011. "A Comparative Case Study of Indonesian and UK Organisational Culture Differences in IS Project Management," International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), IGI Global, vol. 7(2), pages 28-37, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jthi00:v:7:y:2011:i:2:p:28-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jthi.2011040104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jthi00:v:7:y:2011:i:2:p:28-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.