IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jthi00/v12y2016i4p1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information Technology Progress Indicators: Temporal Expectancy, User Preference, and the Perception of Process Duration

Author

Listed:
  • T. S. Amer

    (The W. A. Franke College of Business, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA)

  • Todd L. Johnson

    (The W. A. Franke College of Business, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA)

Abstract

Users of information technology (IT) often encounter “progress indicators” during their interactions. These graphics appear on screen as a user waits for a task to complete and are designed to inform the user of the progress made as the task moves toward completion. This study employs theoretical models from research on human experiences in waiting to develop hypotheses related to the design of one type of progress indicator: the “stalling progress bar.” That is, a progress bar that moves consistently during most of the computing process but then stalls for an indeterminate period before completing. Data from one experiment indicates that participants preferred a progress bar that moves consistently to a stalling progress bar, and judged the process duration to be shorter with the linear progress bar. Data from a second experiment indicates that displaying an explanatory message with a stalling progress bar enhances participant's perception about the stalling bar.

Suggested Citation

  • T. S. Amer & Todd L. Johnson, 2016. "Information Technology Progress Indicators: Temporal Expectancy, User Preference, and the Perception of Process Duration," International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), IGI Global, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jthi00:v:12:y:2016:i:4:p:1-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJTHI.2016100101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jthi00:v:12:y:2016:i:4:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.