IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jt0000/v12y2021i2p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging the Theory-Practice Gap: Design-Experts on Capability Sensitive Design

Author

Listed:
  • Naomi Jacobs

    (Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands)

  • Wijnand IJsselsteijn

    (Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Many of the choices that designers and engineers make during a design process impact not only the functionality, usability, or aesthetics of a technology, but also impact the values that might be supported or undermined via the technology design. Designers can actively design for values, and this awareness has led to the development of various ‘ethics by design' approaches. One such approach is capability sensitive design (CSD). Thus far, CSD is only developed from a theoretical-ethical point of view. This article aims to bridge the theory-practice gap by entering into dialogue with various design-experts on ethics by design in general and CSD in particular. An empirical study, consisting of thematic interviews with nine design-experts, was conducted in order to explore design-experts' experiences with designing for values, what they regard as the strengths and weaknesses of CSD, and if CSD could be of practical use to their design (research) practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Naomi Jacobs & Wijnand IJsselsteijn, 2021. "Bridging the Theory-Practice Gap: Design-Experts on Capability Sensitive Design," International Journal of Technoethics (IJT), IGI Global, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jt0000:v:12:y:2021:i:2:p:1-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJT.2021070101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jt0000:v:12:y:2021:i:2:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.