IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jssmet/v8y2017i1p63-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptual Metrics Quality: Comparative Study for 3D Static Meshes

Author

Listed:
  • Nessrine Elloumi

    (Higher Institute of Biotechnology, Sfax, Tunisia)

  • Habiba Loukil Hadj Kacem

    (ISGI, Sfax, Tunisia)

  • Nilanjan Dey

    (Department of Information Technology, Techno India College of Technology, Kolkata, India)

  • Amira S. Ashour

    (Computers and Information Technology College, Tanta, EG)

  • Med Salim Bouhlel

    (Unit Sciences and Technologies of Image and Telecommunications (SETIT), Sfax, Tunisia)

Abstract

A 3D mesh can be subjected to different types of operations, such as compression, watermarking etc. Such processes lead to geometric distortions compared to the original version. In this context, quantifying the resultant modifications to the original mesh and evaluating the perceptual quality of degraded meshes become a critical issue. The perceptual 3D meshes quality is central in several applications to preserve the visual appearance of these treatments. The used metrics results have to be well correlated to the visual perception of humans. Although there are objective metrics, they do not allow the prediction of the perceptual quality, and do not include the human visual system properties. In the current work, a comparative study between the perceptual quality assessment metrics for 3D meshes was conducted. The experimental study on subjective database published by LIRIS / EPFL was used to test and to validate the results of six metrics. The results established that the Mesh Structural Distortion Measure metric achieved superior results compared to the other metrics.

Suggested Citation

  • Nessrine Elloumi & Habiba Loukil Hadj Kacem & Nilanjan Dey & Amira S. Ashour & Med Salim Bouhlel, 2017. "Perceptual Metrics Quality: Comparative Study for 3D Static Meshes," International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), IGI Global, vol. 8(1), pages 63-80, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jssmet:v:8:y:2017:i:1:p:63-80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJSSMET.2017010105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jssmet:v:8:y:2017:i:1:p:63-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.