IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jskd00/v5y2013i3p17-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Stressors in Usability Tests: Empirical Results and Practical Recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Monique Janneck

    (Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Luebeck University of Applied Sciences, Luebeck, Germany)

  • Makbule Balin

    (eparo GmbH, Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

In this study the authors investigated whether the experience of stressors would influence the performance of users in usability tests as well as their subjective rating of the usability of an interactive system. To that end, an experimental study was conducted comparing a usability test that was performed in the lab under quiet, relaxed conditions with a test situation where several stressors (time pressure, noise, social pressure) were applied. Results show that participants in stress conditions performed worse regarding the completion and correctness of the tasks. The stress and negative feelings the participants experienced also influenced their view of the tested software. Participants in stress conditions rated the usability of the software and their user experience more negative. Implications for the practice of usability testing are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Monique Janneck & Makbule Balin, 2013. "Using Stressors in Usability Tests: Empirical Results and Practical Recommendations," International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development (IJSKD), IGI Global, vol. 5(3), pages 17-31, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jskd00:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:17-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijskd.2013070102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jskd00:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:17-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.