IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jskd00/v13y2021i2p105-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fall Risk Evaluation and Feedback System for Older Adults: From a Technical to a Sociotechnical Need

Author

Listed:
  • Isa Jahnke

    (University of Missouri-Columbia, USA)

  • Lorraine J. Phillips

    (University of Delaware, USA)

  • Fatih Demir

    (Northern Illinois University, USA)

  • Carmen Abbott

    (University of Missouri, USA)

  • Marjorie Skubic

    (University of Missouri, USA)

Abstract

Falls are widespread among older adults causing serious injuries and threatening their quality of life. An approach to estimate fall risk, and to prevent falls, is the Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) test. The TUG test has established validity and reliability. However, as a clinical test, it is not accessible for personal use. To enhance its reach, the authors developed a prototype called Fall Risk Evaluation and Feedback System (FREFS). The prototype is a Kinect-based depth sensor system with interfaces that support older adults in completing the TUG test and receiving personalized test results. The personalized feedback feature is novel that existing prototypes do not include. This study's goal was to gain knowledge of the user experience of FREFS. This research applied methods of observation, interviews, and collected responses on the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results show participants perceived the system as usable, with SUS score of 84.3, but also revealed issues. First, users were unsure how to deal with the TUG tests results when the results showed high fall risk. Second, clearer instructions and reduction of information overload specifically for these age groups were needed. Third, a communication approach embedded into the system would be required (i.e., a link to a chatbot feature or a button to connect to a real person). Overall, the study demonstrated that such a prototype cannot be fully automated; it needs a sociotechnical system solution that includes human communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Isa Jahnke & Lorraine J. Phillips & Fatih Demir & Carmen Abbott & Marjorie Skubic, 2021. "A Fall Risk Evaluation and Feedback System for Older Adults: From a Technical to a Sociotechnical Need," International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development (IJSKD), IGI Global, vol. 13(2), pages 105-118, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jskd00:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:105-118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJSKD.2021040107
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jskd00:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:105-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.