IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jsds00/v4y2013i4p41-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Multi-Objective Model for R&D Project Portfolio Selection Considering Potential Repetitive Projects and Sanction Impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Masoud Rabbani

    (School of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran)

  • Amirhossein Najjarbashi

    (School of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran)

  • Mohammad Joudi

    (School of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran)

Abstract

In today’s highly competitive marketplace, selecting an appropriate set of projects from a portfolio of candidate projects is vital for enterprises. An accurate selection of projects can steer a company to great success, while a careless selection may lead it to bankruptcy. Variability of project parameters such as benefit, cost, risk (failure probability), etc. during planning horizon makes this selection more complicated and increases the importance of an elaborate analysis. In this article, we studied a multi-objective R&D project portfolio selection problem. There is a conflicting desire to maximize expected net benefit and minimize risk in companies. From a novel perspective, the authors considered repetitive projects and variable amounts for aforementioned project parameters during planning horizon that could be an effect of sanctions, in our model that are features of real world problems. Due to NP-hardness of the problem and its high computational effort especially when the number of projects grows, we solved test problems of different sizes using a Multi-Objective Differential Evolution (MODE) algorithm to find pareto optimal solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Masoud Rabbani & Amirhossein Najjarbashi & Mohammad Joudi, 2013. "A New Multi-Objective Model for R&D Project Portfolio Selection Considering Potential Repetitive Projects and Sanction Impacts," International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences (IJSDS), IGI Global, vol. 4(4), pages 41-54, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jsds00:v:4:y:2013:i:4:p:41-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijsds.2013100103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jichao Li & Bingfeng Ge & Jiang Jiang & Kewei Yang & Yingwu Chen, 2020. "High-end weapon equipment portfolio selection based on a heterogeneous network model," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 78(4), pages 743-761, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jsds00:v:4:y:2013:i:4:p:41-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.