IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jrcm00/v2y2013i1p36-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Support Model for Fire Insurance Risk Analysis in a Petrochemical Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Hadis Z. Nejad

    (Department of Economics and management Department, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)

  • Reza Samizadeh

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran)

Abstract

A decision support system was researched and applied to a case study in the petrochemical industry. The participants were an insurance company underwriting the policies of oil and gas refineries located in a major oil producing nation. The Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis methodology was applied as a framework to implement uncertainty quantification and risk analysis using a specialized commercial DSS software product. A gas vapor explosion was simulated at an oil refinery, to predict the fire and radiation damage. Costs and risks were entered into the model based on historical data. Loss estimates were generated for equipment and buildings located various distances (pressures) from the explosion origin. Overall, the DSS model predicted an expected loss of over $14,000,000 USD for equipment located in the 50 meter explosion radius, which represented a loss ratio of almost 52%. The losses predicted from the DSS model were comparable to the literature and to experiences of the case study company. The margin of error from the DSS model was less than ±5% which made it very reliable according to benchmarks.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadis Z. Nejad & Reza Samizadeh, 2013. "Decision Support Model for Fire Insurance Risk Analysis in a Petrochemical Case Study," International Journal of Risk and Contingency Management (IJRCM), IGI Global, vol. 2(1), pages 36-50, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jrcm00:v:2:y:2013:i:1:p:36-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijrcm.2013010103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jrcm00:v:2:y:2013:i:1:p:36-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.