IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jrcm00/v10y2021i1p36-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Geopolitical Risk: A Case Study of Four Balochistan Routes in China

Author

Listed:
  • Syed Mehmood Ali Shah

    (Jilin University, China)

  • Wuh Hao

    (Jilin University, China)

Abstract

China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is a key geopolitical move that guarantees releasing financial possibilities of Pakistan and China, and in addition, it expands the vital position of Pakistan. It underwrites that Pakistan would give a steady framework to change this move into a really interconnected world that advances harmony, advancement, and flourishing. CPEC is a cognizant exertion to accomplish participation in various fields including exchange, barrier, vitality, training, and science and innovation. Beginning their adventure from January 1963 from respective long-haul exchange assertion and going through various stages like facilitated commerce understanding in 2006-2007 to China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), Pakistan's and China's “press fraternity” or “all climate kinship” is relied upon to be additionally fortified through this deliberately essential risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Syed Mehmood Ali Shah & Wuh Hao, 2021. "Strategic Geopolitical Risk: A Case Study of Four Balochistan Routes in China," International Journal of Risk and Contingency Management (IJRCM), IGI Global, vol. 10(1), pages 36-44, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jrcm00:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:36-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJRCM.2021010104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jrcm00:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:36-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.