IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jmhci0/v1y2009i2p56-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User Evaluation of Mobile Devices: In-Situ versus Laboratory Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Francis Jambon

    (Grenoble Universities, France)

Abstract

Nowadays, mobile devices features are often linked up to the context of usage. As a consequence, researchers must consider not only the user and the device, but also the surrounding environment when designing effective user study evaluations. Two opposite experimental setups are possible: in-situ and in the laboratory. There is no consensus on their respective benefits, for instance with regard to the number of usability issues detected. In this paper, we isolate independent variables that could contribute to evaluation biases by proposing a taxonomy that splits the in-situ experimental setups into two new setups. We describe the concept of the “Uncertainty Principle” to emphasize the dilemma between precise observation and bias minimization and introduce the “Trojan Horse” technique to partially overcome the consequences of the uncertainty principle. As a conclusion, a methodology using both laboratory and in-situ experiments in a complementary way is proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Francis Jambon, 2009. "User Evaluation of Mobile Devices: In-Situ versus Laboratory Experiments," International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI), IGI Global, vol. 1(2), pages 56-71, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jmhci0:v:1:y:2009:i:2:p:56-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jmhci.2009040104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jmhci0:v:1:y:2009:i:2:p:56-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.