IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jkm000/v3y2007i2p31-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of Factors that Influence the Success of Knowledge Management Practices in U.S. Federal Agencies

Author

Listed:
  • Elsa Rhoads

    (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, USA)

  • Kevin J. O'Sullivan

    (New York Institute of Technology, USA)

  • Michael Stankosky

    (The George Washington University, USA)

Abstract

This research article investigates the status of knowledge management (KM) practices imple-mented across federal agencies of the U.S. government. It analyzes the extent to which this status is influenced by the size of the agency, whether or not the agency type is a cabinet-level department or independent agency, the longevity of KM practices implemented in the agency, whether or not the agency has adopted a written KM policy or strategy, and whether the primary responsibility for KM practices in the agency is directed by a chief knowledge officer (CKO) or KM unit versus other functional locations in the agency. The research also tests for possible KM practitioner bias, since the survey was directed to members of the Knowledge Management Working Group (KMWG) of the Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council who are KM practitioners in federal agencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Elsa Rhoads & Kevin J. O'Sullivan & Michael Stankosky, 2007. "An Evaluation of Factors that Influence the Success of Knowledge Management Practices in U.S. Federal Agencies," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 3(2), pages 31-46, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jkm000:v:3:y:2007:i:2:p:31-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jkm.2007040102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jkm000:v:3:y:2007:i:2:p:31-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.