IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jitbag/v10y2019i1p1-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diminishing the Gap Between IT Governance Maturity Theory and Practice: Renewing the Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Daniël Smits

    (Twente University, Enschede, Netherlands)

  • Jos van Hillegersberg

    (Twente University, Enschede, Netherlands)

Abstract

IT governance research suggests the existence of a gap between theoretical frameworks and practice. Although current ITG research is largely focused on hard governance (structure, processes), soft governance (behavior, collaboration) is equally important and might be crucial to close the gap. The goal of this study is to determine what IT governance maturity models are available and if there remains a mismatch. The authors conducted a systematic literature review to create an overview of available IT governance maturity models. The study shows five new IT governance maturity models were introduced. Only one of the new IT governance maturity models covers hard and soft IT governance in detail. This model and corresponding instrument was used to illustrate its usability in practice. The authors demonstrate that combining the instrument with structured interviews results in a usable instrument to determine an organization's current maturity level of hard and soft IT governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniël Smits & Jos van Hillegersberg, 2019. "Diminishing the Gap Between IT Governance Maturity Theory and Practice: Renewing the Approach," International Journal of IT/Business Alignment and Governance (IJITBAG), IGI Global, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jitbag:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:1-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJITBAG.2019010101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jitbag:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:1-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.