IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jisss0/v12y2020i1p67-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological Boundary Management, the Most Essential Source for Org-Improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng Weibo

    (Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang, China)

  • Hao Dingding

    (Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang, China)

  • Zheng Lu

    (Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin, China)

Abstract

As globalization and IT application facilitate organizations to develop without boundary in the era of the Industrial Revolution, innovations and changes have become the new normal of organizations. In this background, psychological boundaries can help employees enhance their sense of identity and sense of belonging to the organization, which is an effective way to improve the organizational effectiveness and the most essential source for org-improvement. This paper teases out the domestic and foreign research results pertaining to the connotation, measurement, and influencing factors of psychological boundaries. The perspective of the psychological boundaries provides new ideas for the managers in the era of the Industrial Revolution to establish a long-term “Heart-Central” management mechanism which reveals the essence of management problems and leads management back to its origin.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng Weibo & Hao Dingding & Zheng Lu, 2020. "Psychological Boundary Management, the Most Essential Source for Org-Improvement," International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector (IJISSS), IGI Global, vol. 12(1), pages 67-74, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jisss0:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:67-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJISSS.2020010105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jisss0:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:67-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.