IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jisp00/v18y2024i1p1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leveraging TenSEAL: A Comparative Study of BFV and CKKS Schemes for Training ML Models on Encrypted IoT Data

Author

Listed:
  • Yancho Basil Wiryen

    (University of Douala, Cameroon)

  • Noumsi Auguste Vigny

    (University of Douala, Cameroon)

  • Mvogo Joseph Ngono

    (University of Douala, Cameroon)

  • Fono Louis Aimé

    (University of Douala, Cameroon)

Abstract

In our interconnected world, the use of Internet of Things (IoT) devices generates vast amounts of sensitive data. To secure this data while extracting insights, privacy-preserving machine learning (PPML) tools like Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) are crucial. This study compares two FHE schemes, BFV and CKKS, for protecting IoT data during PPML analysis. Logistic regression models are implemented on encrypted datasets using the TenSEAL library, and the accuracy and efficiency are compared with unencrypted data. The study focuses on privacy preservation, computational overhead, and model accuracy. Using the capabilities of TenSEAL, the study finds that both BFV and CKKS effectively preserve IoT data privacy during ML tasks. BFV demonstrates superior computational efficiency, enabling faster analysis and training, while CKKS achieves higher accuracy in predicting IoT data. This study aids researchers in selecting the most suitable homomorphic encryption scheme for their needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Yancho Basil Wiryen & Noumsi Auguste Vigny & Mvogo Joseph Ngono & Fono Louis Aimé, 2024. "Leveraging TenSEAL: A Comparative Study of BFV and CKKS Schemes for Training ML Models on Encrypted IoT Data," International Journal of Information Security and Privacy (IJISP), IGI Global, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jisp00:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:1-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJISP.356402
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jisp00:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.