IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jismd0/v5y2014i1p1-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Experimental Comparison of System Diagrams and Textual Use Cases for the Identification of Safety Hazards

Author

Listed:
  • Tor Stålhane

    (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway)

  • Guttorm Sindre

    (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

Requirement defects are more costly to correct the later in the development process they are discovered. The same applies to safety requirements, and defects that remain in the fielded system are then not only costly, but potentially life-threatening. It is important to discover safety hazards as early in the process as possible, and it is thus interesting to integrate safety analysis with techniques used in the early stage of requirements engineering. This paper describes an experiment comparing how well two system diagrams and textual use cases support non-experts in identifying hazards in a simple control system. Results show that system diagrams were better for finding hazards related to peripheral equipment, while for all other kinds of hazards textual use cases were as good or better. Not only the type of representation matters, but also how the information is brought into focus for the analyst, as this might steer the analyst towards noting some hazards but ignoring others.

Suggested Citation

  • Tor Stålhane & Guttorm Sindre, 2014. "An Experimental Comparison of System Diagrams and Textual Use Cases for the Identification of Safety Hazards," International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD), IGI Global, vol. 5(1), pages 1-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jismd0:v:5:y:2014:i:1:p:1-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijismd.2014010101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernsmed, Karin & Bour, Guillaume & Lundgren, Martin & Bergström, Erik, 2022. "An evaluation of practitioners’ perceptions of a security risk assessment methodology in air traffic management projects," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jismd0:v:5:y:2014:i:1:p:1-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.