IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jiit00/v6y2010i3p56-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the Hybrid Credit Scoring Models Based on Various Classifiers

Author

Listed:
  • Fei-Long Chen

    (National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan)

  • Feng-Chia Li

    (Jen-Teh Junior College and National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan)

Abstract

Credit scoring is an important topic for businesses and socio-economic establishments collecting huge amounts of data, with the intention of making the wrong decision obsolete. In this paper, the authors propose four approaches that combine four well-known classifiers, such as K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Back-Propagation Network (BPN) and Extreme Learning Machine (ELM). These classifiers are used to find a suitable hybrid classifier combination featuring selection that retains sufficient information for classification purposes. In this regard, different credit scoring combinations are constructed by selecting features with four approaches and classifiers than would otherwise be chosen. Two credit data sets from the University of California, Irvine (UCI), are chosen to evaluate the accuracy of the various hybrid features selection models. In this paper, the procedures that are part of the proposed approaches are described and then evaluated for their performances.

Suggested Citation

  • Fei-Long Chen & Feng-Chia Li, 2010. "Comparison of the Hybrid Credit Scoring Models Based on Various Classifiers," International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies (IJIIT), IGI Global, vol. 6(3), pages 56-74, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jiit00:v:6:y:2010:i:3:p:56-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jiit.2010070104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jiit00:v:6:y:2010:i:3:p:56-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.