IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jhisi0/v9y2014i4p1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Balanced Perspective to Perioperative Process Management Aligned to Hospital Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Jim Ryan

    (Sorrell College of Business, Troy University, Phenix City, AL, USA)

  • Barbara Doster

    (University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital, Birmingham, AL, USA)

  • Sandra Daily

    (University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital, Birmingham, AL, USA)

  • Carmen Lewis

    (Sorrell College of Business, Troy University, Phenix City, AL, USA)

Abstract

Dynamic technological activities of analysis, evaluation, and synthesis can highlight complex relationships within integrated processes to target improvement and ultimately yield improved processes. Likewise, the identification of existing process limitations, potential capabilities, and subsequent contextual understanding are contributing factors that yield measured improvement. Based on a 120-month longitudinal study of an academic medical center, this study investigates how integrated information systems and business analytics can improve perioperative efficiency and effectiveness across patient quality of care, stakeholder satisfaction, clinical operations, and financial cost effectiveness. This case study examines process management practices of balanced scorecard and dashboards to monitor and improve the perioperative process, aligned to overall hospital goals at strategic, tactical, and operational levels. The conclusion includes discussion of study implications and limitations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jim Ryan & Barbara Doster & Sandra Daily & Carmen Lewis, 2014. "A Balanced Perspective to Perioperative Process Management Aligned to Hospital Strategy," International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics (IJHISI), IGI Global, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jhisi0:v:9:y:2014:i:4:p:1-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijhisi.2014100101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jhisi0:v:9:y:2014:i:4:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.