Author
Listed:
- Peter A. Lichtenberg
(Wayne State University, USA)
- Amanda Schafer Johnson
(Wayne State University, USA)
- David M. Erlanger
(HeadMinderTM Corporation, USA)
- Tanya Kaushik
(HeadMinderTM Corporation, USA)
- Michael E. Maddens
(William Beaumont Hospital, USA)
- Khaled Imam
(William Beaumont Hospital, USA)
- Jeffrey Barth
(University of Virginia, USA)
- Frank M. Webbe
(Florida Institute of Technology, USA)
Abstract
Cognitive screening measures for age-related cognitive impairment have been found to have only fair validity, and the risks of harm even may outweigh the benefits at this time (U.S. Preventative Service Task Force, 2003). A large-scale project designed to assess elder care in Primary Care Physician offices noted that dementia evaluation and treatment was one of the most overlooked aspects of care. Taken together, these studies cited the lack of time and technical expertise in test administration as the most prominent barriers to the accurate detection of dementia in Primary Care Physician offices. It was for these reasons that the Cognitive Screening Test (CST) was created. The CST requires no physician time or training to administer or interpret it. The current study investigated the clinical utility of this cognitive screening system by comparing the results of 102 patients to those of expert geriatricians, using consensus conference methods for diagnosis. Overall clinical utility demonstrated scores at .80 or above for sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive power. In contrast, the MMSE had only a .38 sensitivity. A Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analysis indicated a .863 accuracy rating for the predetermined cut score on the CST.
Suggested Citation
Peter A. Lichtenberg & Amanda Schafer Johnson & David M. Erlanger & Tanya Kaushik & Michael E. Maddens & Khaled Imam & Jeffrey Barth & Frank M. Webbe, 2006.
"Enhancing Cognitive Screening in Geriatric Care: Use of an Internet-Based System,"
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics (IJHISI), IGI Global, vol. 1(3), pages 47-57, July.
Handle:
RePEc:igg:jhisi0:v:1:y:2006:i:3:p:47-57
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jhisi0:v:1:y:2006:i:3:p:47-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.