IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jhisi0/v15y2020i4p56-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnostic Analysis of Patients Qualified for Hip Replacement Using Multi-Criteria Methods: Clinical Decision Support System

Author

Listed:
  • Luiza Fabisiak

    (West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland)

  • Karina Szczypor-Piasecka

    (Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

Patients with advanced hip osteoarthritis are likely to suffer from biomechanical disorders. As many criteria inform how such patients are being qualified for alloplasty procedures, this article proposes a multi-criteria decisional framework in qualifying patients for treatment while undergoing diagnostic analysis for hip replacement surgery. In order to assess the patient's health condition, the competence of physicians and physiotherapists must first be checked. After creating the expert preference model and decision tree, the AHP method was applied followed by the Electre Tri method in the next stage of verification. Integrating these analytic procedures, a group of patients can be quickly evaluated and meaningfully profiled. Specifically, these patients can be classified in respect of their condition determined during hospitalisation as per the severity of degenerative disease and on the basis of their subjective feelings and diagnostics. The proposed methodology promises to allow optimal treatment to be assigned while enabling the appropriate classification and verification within group of patients targeted for hip replacement surgery.

Suggested Citation

  • Luiza Fabisiak & Karina Szczypor-Piasecka, 2020. "Diagnostic Analysis of Patients Qualified for Hip Replacement Using Multi-Criteria Methods: Clinical Decision Support System," International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics (IJHISI), IGI Global, vol. 15(4), pages 56-69, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jhisi0:v:15:y:2020:i:4:p:56-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJHISI.2020100104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jhisi0:v:15:y:2020:i:4:p:56-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.