IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jfsa00/v3y2013i1p51-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Software Quality using Choquet Integral Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Vatesh Pasrija

    (Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Pilani, Rajasthan, India)

  • Praveen Ranjan Srivastava

    (Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Pilani, Rajasthan, India)

Abstract

Software development comprises of processes which can be controlled, managed and improved by software measurement. The efficiency of software measurement is determined by software quality, which assesses the position of any software company in the international economic scenario. This calls for a need to develop quality models which would quantify the various quality parameters. However, these quality parameters are highly vague, by nature, and cannot be easily quantized nor measured. The Boehm’s Model, McCall’s Model, and ISO/IEC 9126 Model are existing quality models made by software quality researchers in this regard. This paper uses the ISO/IEC 9126 quality model as the baseline model, with enhanced criteria, to give a holistic approach to software quality. A methodology is proposed in this paper for comparing different software solutions based on the SRS to a common problem. As software product quality is highly unpredictable, and considering the interaction between the quality criteria, Choquet Integral is used to efficiently compare the set of software products.

Suggested Citation

  • Vatesh Pasrija & Praveen Ranjan Srivastava, 2013. "Evaluation of Software Quality using Choquet Integral Approach," International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications (IJFSA), IGI Global, vol. 3(1), pages 51-81, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jfsa00:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:51-81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijfsa.2013010104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jfsa00:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:51-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.