IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jepr00/v10y2021i3p35-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Urban Planning Platforms: The Interplay of Digital and Local Embeddedness in Urban Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko

    (Tampere University, Finland)

Abstract

This article discusses platformization and its impact on urban planning. Platformization refers to an increased utilization of platform logic in society. In urban planning, it is manifest in the emergence of digital co-production platforms. They offer a range of genuinely beneficial features—especially digitally-assisted collaborative mapping, ideation, sharing, and analytics—and facilitated integration of citizen input into democratic planning system. As such, they have a potential to develop into a new urban planning model that meets the needs of a complex late modern society.

Suggested Citation

  • Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko, 2021. "Digital Urban Planning Platforms: The Interplay of Digital and Local Embeddedness in Urban Planning," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 10(3), pages 35-49, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jepr00:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:35-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJEPR.20210701.oa3
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Tenney & Renee Sieber, 2016. "Data-Driven Participation: Algorithms, Cities, Citizens, and Corporate Control," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 101-113.
    2. Liisa Horelli & Joanna Saad-Sulonen & Sirkku Wallin & Andrea Botero, 2015. "When Self-Organization Intersects with Urban Planning: Two Cases from Helsinki," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 286-302, June.
    3. John Stehlin & Michael Hodson & Andrew McMeekin, 2020. "Platform mobilities and the production of urban space: Toward a typology of platformization trajectories," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(7), pages 1250-1268, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Irena Szymańska, 2021. "The Importance of the Sharing Economy in Improving the Quality of Life and Social Integration of Local Communities on the Example of Virtual Groups," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Melinda Benkő & Bence Bene & Ádám Pirity & Árpád Szabó & Tamás Egedy, 2021. "Real vs. Virtual City: Planning Issues in a Discontinuous Urban Area in Budapest’s Inner City," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 150-163.
    3. Yan Han & Jianming Cai & Enpu Ma & Shanshan Du & Jing Lin, 2023. "Understanding Smart City Practice in Urban China: A Governance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Marijana Pantić & Juaneé Cilliers & Guido Cimadomo & Fernando Montaño & Olusola Olufemi & Sally Torres Mallma & Johan van den Berg, 2021. "Challenges and Opportunities for Public Participation in Urban and Regional Planning during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Lessons Learned for the Future," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Palmyra Repette & Jamile Sabatini-Marques & Tan Yigitcanlar & Denilson Sell & Eduardo Costa, 2021. "The Evolution of City-as-a-Platform: Smart Urban Development Governance with Collective Knowledge-Based Platform Urbanism," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Liisa Horelli & Sirkku Wallin, 2024. "Civic Engagement in Urban Planning and Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Rojanakit, Patcharapar & Torres de Oliveira, Rui & Dulleck, Uwe, 2022. "The sharing economy: A critical review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1317-1334.
    4. Igor Calzada, 2020. "Platform and Data Co-Operatives amidst European Pandemic Citizenship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Mona Roman & Henry Varga & Vladimir Cvijanovic & Alasdair Reid, 2020. "Quadruple Helix Models for Sustainable Regional Innovation: Engaging and Facilitating Civil Society Participation," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, June.
    6. Ye, Jianhong & Zheng, Jiaqi, 2024. "How stakeholders influence MaaS implementation? An analysis based on evolutionary game theory," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 198-210.
    7. Soltani, Ali & Allan, Andrew & Khalaj, Fahimeh & Pojani, Dorina & Mehdizadeh, Milad, 2021. "Ridesharing in Adelaide: Segmentation of users," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Secinaro, Silvana & Brescia, Valerio & Lanzalonga, Federico & Santoro, Gabriele, 2022. "Smart city reporting: A bibliometric and structured literature review analysis to identify technological opportunities and challenges for sustainable development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 296-313.
    9. Jalaluddin Abdul Malek & Seng Boon Lim & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Social Inclusion Indicators for Building Citizen-Centric Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, January.
    10. De Jong, Martin & Joss, Simon & Taeihagh, Araz, 2024. "Smart cities as spatial manifestations of 21st century capitalism," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    11. Spinney, Justin & Lin, Wen-I, 2021. "A vehicle for valorising the labour power of commuting: The politics of mobility fixing in Shanghai's Dockless Public Bike Sharing Sector," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. Lummina G. Horlings & Christian Lamker & Emma Puerari & Ward Rauws & Gwenda van der Vaart, 2021. "Citizen Engagement in Spatial Planning, Shaping Places Together," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Lopamudra Patnaik Saxena, 2020. "Community Self-Organisation from a Social-Ecological Perspective: ‘ Burlang Yatra’ and Revival of Millets in Odisha (India)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, March.
    14. Roman, Mona & Fellnhofer, Katharina, 2022. "Facilitating the participation of civil society in regional planning: Implementing quadruple helix model in Finnish regions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Gebrial, Dalia, 2022. "Racial platform capitalism: empire, migration and the making of Uber in London," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115538, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Shuhai Zhang & Gert de Roo & Ward Rauws, 2020. "Understanding self-organization and formal institutions in peri-urban transformations: A case study from Beijing," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(2), pages 287-303, February.
    17. Maria Ehrnström-Fuentes & Hanna Leipämaa-Leskinen, 2019. "Boundary Negotiations in a Self-Organized Grassroots-Led Food Network: The Case of REKO in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, July.
    18. Alvarez León, Luis F. & Aoyama, Yuko, 2022. "Industry emergence and market capture: The rise of autonomous vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    19. Fenna Imara Hoefsloot & Javier Martínez & Christine Richter & Karin Pfeffer, 2020. "Expert-Amateurs and Smart Citizens: How Digitalization Reconfigures Lima’s Water Infrastructure," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 312-323.
    20. Rachel G McKane & David J Hess, 2022. "Ridesourcing and urban inequality in Chicago: Connecting mobility disparities to unequal development, gentrification, and displacement," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(3), pages 572-592, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jepr00:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:35-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.