IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jeoe00/v8y2019i3p69-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking of Indicators for Estimation of Plant Efficiency in Hydropower Plants by a Bootstrap MCDM Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Priyanka Majumder

    (NIT Agartala, Jirania, India)

  • Apu Kumar Saha

    (NIT Agartala, Jirania, India)

Abstract

The overall commitment of hydropower plants (HPP) in providing the interest for power is 1106 TWh. The issue with hydropower lies with the way that its proficiency relies upon numerous indicators which are elements of climatic, pressure driven and financial markets. Every one of these indicators again rely on pressure driven misfortune forced because of the time being used, change in energy requirements, locational interference and quality of the machine installed. As there are numerous indicators having diverse levels of impact on the execution productivity of HPP, a few indicators are exaggerated and some others stay under appraised which brings about incorrect basic leadership. The present study proposes another cross breed show in view of the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Also in the present investigation rank of each indicator determine by Statistical Process Control (SPC). The needs are dictated by hybrid technique in particular SPC-DEMATEL-AHP. As per the outcomes, effectiveness of turbine is the most noteworthy for impacting general productivity of HPP.

Suggested Citation

  • Priyanka Majumder & Apu Kumar Saha, 2019. "Ranking of Indicators for Estimation of Plant Efficiency in Hydropower Plants by a Bootstrap MCDM Approach," International Journal of Energy Optimization and Engineering (IJEOE), IGI Global, vol. 8(3), pages 69-92, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jeoe00:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:69-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJEOE.2019070104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jeoe00:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:69-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.