IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jeoe00/v6y2017i4p16-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Confrontation of Lattice Boltzmann, Finite Difference and Taguchi Experimental Design Results for Optimizing Plasma Spraying Operating Conditions Toward Deposit Requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Ridha Djebali

    (ISLAIB, University of Jendouba, Béja, Tunisia & UR: Matériaux, Energie et Energies Renouvelables (MEER), University of Gafsa, Tunisia)

Abstract

The aim of the present work is the confrontation of three numerical techniques results to optimize the operating conditions of thermal plasma spraying process. The Lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) is used to scrutinize dispersion effects of injection parameters on droplet impact characteristics when impacting substrate. The validation of the developed model shows good agreement with former findings. The results of spraying Zirconia particles give the values Kmin=88.2, Kmax=367.4, Kmean=273.8 and a standard deviation of 48.0 for the Sommerfeld number. The Taguchi experimental design study is conducted for five operating parameters of two levels. The ensuing retained factors combination give Kmean=258.9. To assess drawn conclusions, confirmation test was performed using the Jets&Poudres software. The results show that the prior way is to coat and particles of dp

Suggested Citation

  • Ridha Djebali, 2017. "A Confrontation of Lattice Boltzmann, Finite Difference and Taguchi Experimental Design Results for Optimizing Plasma Spraying Operating Conditions Toward Deposit Requirements," International Journal of Energy Optimization and Engineering (IJEOE), IGI Global, vol. 6(4), pages 16-34, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jeoe00:v:6:y:2017:i:4:p:16-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJEOE.2017100102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jeoe00:v:6:y:2017:i:4:p:16-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.