IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jeis00/v9y2013i1p49-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selecting Cell Phone Service Using Hybrid Decision Making Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Kouroush Jenab

    (Society of Reliability Engineering-Ottawa, Toronto, ON, Canada)

  • Ahmad Sarfaraz

    (Department of Manufacturing System Engineering and Management, California State University-Northridge, Northridge, CA, USA)

Abstract

In an ever expanding connected world, mobile connectivity is essential in both commercial and private use. Selecting the best option has become increasingly difficult due to the many factors surrounding the selection of the best cell phone service providing company. Quantitative factors such as monthly price, total cell phone minutes, and phone cost are easily comparable. However, other qualitative factors such as signal coverage, vendor reputation, and customer support are not as easily analyzed. The need to make the correct decision when qualitative factors need to be considered has caused multi-criteria decision methodologies such as Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to be applied in case studies. In this paper, the authors apply Fuzzy AHP to phone survey results and compare them to the original results. The multi-criteria decision methodology TOPSIS is used to demonstrate the differences between all decision methodologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kouroush Jenab & Ahmad Sarfaraz, 2013. "Selecting Cell Phone Service Using Hybrid Decision Making Methodology," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 9(1), pages 49-61, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jeis00:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:49-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jeis.2013010103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jeis00:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:49-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.