IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jeco00/v1y2003i2p1-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking Technological Compatibility and Operational Capacity Constraints to Communication Technology Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Elliot Bendoly

    (Emory University, USA)

  • Frederick Kaefer

    (Loyola University Chicago, USA)

Abstract

Two interacting issues have recently been shown to theoretically impact communication technology adoption: the willingness of business partners to use various communication technologies and a firm’s operational capacity to accommodate the product/service demands of these potential partners. This study examines the relationship between these two issues and Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), a long standardized communication technology that has been underutilized by business organizations. Our findings suggest that the technological compatibility concerns of firms considering EDI adoption differ depending on if they are product or service oriented. Capacity limitations are found to significantly moderate these compatibility effects. The implications for managers of electronic commerce technologies are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Elliot Bendoly & Frederick Kaefer, 2003. "Linking Technological Compatibility and Operational Capacity Constraints to Communication Technology Adoption," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global, vol. 1(2), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jeco00:v:1:y:2003:i:2:p:1-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jeco.2003040101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matta, Vic & Koonce, David & Jeyaraj, Anand, 2012. "Initiation, Experimentation, Implementation of innovations: The case for Radio Frequency Identification Systems," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 164-174.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jeco00:v:1:y:2003:i:2:p:1-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.