IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jeco00/v15y2017i1p1-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploratory Study on the Stability of Consumer Rationality in Judging Online Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Makoto Nakayama

    (College of Computing and Digital Media, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA)

Abstract

Consumers are often asked valuate the quality of online reviews. However, they often misjudge the true value of reviews because their thoughts on reviews are not well formed with criteria. This exploratory study conducted stylized survey-based experiments using 217 consumers. Consumers typically underestimate the value of reviews because they do not always use valuation criteria when reading reviews. The extent of such underestimations ranges from 12% to 15% for goods with objective attributes like electronic products. In addition, nearly half of the consumers revised their review valuations upon taking a second look at the same review for these goods. Close to one-third of the consumers changed their review valuations for subjective goods like music albums. Such valuation changes are specific to consumer profiles. Their predominant emotional sentiment also has a varying effect on subjective and non-subjective goods.

Suggested Citation

  • Makoto Nakayama, 2017. "Exploratory Study on the Stability of Consumer Rationality in Judging Online Reviews," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jeco00:v:15:y:2017:i:1:p:1-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/JECO.2017010101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Makoto Nakayama & Yun Wan, 2019. "Same sushi, different impressions: a cross-cultural analysis of Yelp reviews," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 181-207, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jeco00:v:15:y:2017:i:1:p:1-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.