IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jdst00/v2y2011i3p49-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of Wireless Sensor Networks for Different Mobile Event Path Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Yang

    (Fukuoka Institute of Technology, Japan)

  • Gjergji Mino

    (Fukuoka Institute of Technology, Japan)

  • Leonard Barolli

    (Fukuoka Institute of Technology, Japan)

  • Makoto Ikeda

    (Seikei University, Japan)

  • Fatos Xhafa

    (Technical University of Catalonia, Spain)

  • Arjan Durresi

    (Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), USA)

Abstract

In this paper, the authors investigate how the sensor network performs when the event moves with special movement path. Simulation results are compared with four scenarios: when the event is stationary, moving randomly, moving with simple 4 path, and boids path. The simulation results show that for the case when the event is moving randomly, the performance is the worst in the four scenarios. The characteristic of goodput decreases with the increase of number of sensor nodes. In the case of the boids model, the goodput is unstable when the is lower than 10 pps. The consumed energy characteristic increases with the increase of . Simulation results show that the consumed energy of random movement is the worst among the four scenarios. The consumed energy of boids model is the lowest in four cases. This shows that the event movement with boids model can decrease the consumed energy in large scale WSNs.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Yang & Gjergji Mino & Leonard Barolli & Makoto Ikeda & Fatos Xhafa & Arjan Durresi, 2011. "Performance of Wireless Sensor Networks for Different Mobile Event Path Scenarios," International Journal of Distributed Systems and Technologies (IJDST), IGI Global, vol. 2(3), pages 49-63, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jdst00:v:2:y:2011:i:3:p:49-63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jdst.2011070104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jdst00:v:2:y:2011:i:3:p:49-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.