IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jcfa00/v2y2015i2p1-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stress Testing and Bank Efficiency: Evidence from Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Iftekhar Hasan

    (Gabelli School of Business, Fordham University, New York City, NY, USA and Bank of Finland, Helsinki, Finland)

  • Fotios Pasiouras

    (Surrey Business School, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK & Financial Engineering Laboratory, Technical University of Crete, Chania, Greece)

Abstract

This study examines whether and how the stress testing of European banks in 2010, 2011, and 2014 is related to their technical, allocative, and cost efficiency. Using a sample of large commercial banks operating in 20 European countries, and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), the authors perform comparisons between banks that were included in one of the three European stress tests and untested banks operating in the same countries. They estimate various specifications as for the inputs and outputs, cross-section and pooled estimations, and they also examine alternative samples as for the ownership of banks. In general, the authors conclude that banks included in the stress-test exercises are more efficient that their counterparties. The differences tend to be statistically significant in the case of allocative efficiency and cost efficiency, but not in the case of technical efficiency. With regards to the latter form of efficiency, the results depend upon the specification and the stress test in question.

Suggested Citation

  • Iftekhar Hasan & Fotios Pasiouras, 2015. "Stress Testing and Bank Efficiency: Evidence from Europe," International Journal of Corporate Finance and Accounting (IJCFA), IGI Global, vol. 2(2), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jcfa00:v:2:y:2015:i:2:p:1-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJCFA.2015070101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jcfa00:v:2:y:2015:i:2:p:1-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.