IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jcbpl0/v6y2016i4p75-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Online Dating in Line with the “Social Compensation” and “Rich-Get-Richer” Hypotheses

Author

Listed:
  • Samantha Stinson

    (Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom)

  • Debora Jeske

    (Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom)

Abstract

Computer-mediated communication offers a range of potentially appealing features, including selective self-presentation, social presence control, and simultaneous as well as asynchronous interaction tools. The study examines the influence of personality (introversion and extraversion) and personal variables (social anxiety and public self-consciousness) on online dating preferences from two competing perspectives: the “social compensation” (SC) hypothesis and the “rich-get-richer” (RGR) hypothesis. Survey results (N = 162) revealed that the SC and RGR hypotheses do not hold true within the context of online dating. The findings suggest a stronger role of social influence (e.g., peers) in the decision to online date. The SC and RGR hypotheses may be limited in terms of the extent to which these frameworks adequately explain this online behavior. This may also be due to the increasing popularity of online dating sites, which may make personality and personal traits less informative of whether individuals will opt to use such services.

Suggested Citation

  • Samantha Stinson & Debora Jeske, 2016. "Exploring Online Dating in Line with the “Social Compensation” and “Rich-Get-Richer” Hypotheses," International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), IGI Global, vol. 6(4), pages 75-87, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jcbpl0:v:6:y:2016:i:4:p:75-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJCBPL.2016100106
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jcbpl0:v:6:y:2016:i:4:p:75-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.