IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jcbpl0/v6y2016i2p22-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Bystanders' Willingness to Intervene in Traditional and Cyberbullying Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Justine A. Walker

    (Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK)

  • Debora Jeske

    (Business School, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK)

Abstract

Bullying incidents in traditional and online settings are a cause for concern to many parties. The goal of the current study was to explore the extent to which a bystander would intervene in a bullying incident and the degree to which this behavior is influenced by group size (the number of other witnesses), the setting (traditional or cyberbullying), and gender of the victim. Using an online survey method, participants were presented with eight bullying scenarios, each of which involved verbal bullying of a victim. Participants (N = 82) were asked to report how likely they would be to intervene in each of these scenarios. Results showed that female victims were more likely to be helped than male victims. Furthermore, female participants were more willing to intervene than the male participants in the cyberbullying scenarios. Altruism was a positive predictor of participants' willingness to intervene. The present findings suggest that certain gender differences in helping behavior may depend on the context in which bullying is observed (traditional or cyberbullying).

Suggested Citation

  • Justine A. Walker & Debora Jeske, 2016. "Understanding Bystanders' Willingness to Intervene in Traditional and Cyberbullying Scenarios," International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), IGI Global, vol. 6(2), pages 22-38, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jcbpl0:v:6:y:2016:i:2:p:22-38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJCBPL.2016040102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jcbpl0:v:6:y:2016:i:2:p:22-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.