IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jcbpl0/v3y2013i4p1-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning from Paper, Learning from Screens: Impact of Screen Reading and Multitasking Conditions on Reading and Writing among College Students

Author

Listed:
  • Kaveri Subrahmanyam

    (California State University, Los Angeles, CA, USA & Children’s Digital Media Center @ Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA)

  • Minas Michikyan

    (California State University, Los Angeles, CA, USA & Children’s Digital Media Center @ Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA)

  • Christine Clemmons

    (Children’s Digital Media Center @ Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA & University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA)

  • Rogelio Carrillo

    (California State University, Los Angeles, CA, USA & Children’s Digital Media Center @ Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA)

  • Yalda T. Uhls

    (Children’s Digital Media Center @ Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA & University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA)

  • Patricia M. Greenfield

    (Children’s Digital Media Center @ Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA & University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA)

Abstract

Electronic screens on laptop and tablet computers are being used for reading text, often while multitasking. Two experimental studies with college students explored the effect of medium and opportunities to multitask on reading (Study 1) and report writing (Study 2). In Study 1, participants (N = 120) read an easy and difficult passage on paper, a laptop, or tablet, while either multitasking or not multitasking. Neither multitasking nor medium impacted reading comprehension, but those who multitasked took longer to read both passages, indicating loss of efficiency with multitasking. In Study 2, participants (N = 67) were asked to synthesize source material in multiple texts to write a one-page evidence-based report. Participants read the source texts either on (1) paper, (2) computer screen without Internet or printer access, or (3) computer screen with Internet and printer access (called the “real-world” condition). There were no differences in report quality or efficiency between those whose source materials were paper or computer. However, global report quality was significantly better when participants read source texts on a computer screen without Internet or printer access, compared with when they had Internet and printer access. Active use of paper for note-taking greatly reduced the negative impact of Internet and printer access in the real-world condition. Although participants expressed a preference for accessing information on paper, reading the texts on paper did not make a significant difference in report quality, compared with either of the two computer conditions. Implications for formal and informal learning are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaveri Subrahmanyam & Minas Michikyan & Christine Clemmons & Rogelio Carrillo & Yalda T. Uhls & Patricia M. Greenfield, 2013. "Learning from Paper, Learning from Screens: Impact of Screen Reading and Multitasking Conditions on Reading and Writing among College Students," International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), IGI Global, vol. 3(4), pages 1-27, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jcbpl0:v:3:y:2013:i:4:p:1-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijcbpl.2013100101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. Asim Qayyum & David Smith, 2019. "Improving the Task Understanding for Knowledge Creation in Assessments," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jcbpl0:v:3:y:2013:i:4:p:1-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.