IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jcbpl0/v2y2012i4p49-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Criminality of Cyber-Harassing Behaviors among Undergraduate Students in the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Millman

    (Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK)

  • Monica Whitty

    (Department of Media and Communication, Leicester University, Leicester, UK)

  • Belinda Winder

    (Department of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK)

  • Mark D. Griffiths

    (Department of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK)

Abstract

Whilst cyber-harassment is a criminal act within the United Kingdom, there is little research examining whether cyber-harassing behaviors are perceived as criminal. This paper assesses whether the ‘Big Five’ personality characteristics and Internet self-efficacy influence perceived criminality of cyber-harassing behaviors. The sample comprised 320 undergraduate students who completed an online survey measuring perceived criminality of 18 cyber-harassing behaviors. Principal axis factoring revealed three dimensions: malicious behavior, harassing messages, and malicious software. High Internet self-efficacious individuals (i.e., those who feel more in control of online interactions) were more likely than low Internet self-efficacious individuals to perceive malicious software as criminal. Low-agreeable individuals were more likely than high-agreeable individuals to perceive harassing messages as criminal. Whilst personality and Internet self-efficacy influenced perceived criminality for some cyber-harassing behaviors, the findings were not consistent. The paper discusses the findings and implications for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Millman & Monica Whitty & Belinda Winder & Mark D. Griffiths, 2012. "Perceived Criminality of Cyber-Harassing Behaviors among Undergraduate Students in the United Kingdom," International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), IGI Global, vol. 2(4), pages 49-59, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jcbpl0:v:2:y:2012:i:4:p:49-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijcbpl.2012100104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jcbpl0:v:2:y:2012:i:4:p:49-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.