IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jcallt/v7y2017i1p34-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lexical Profiles of Reading Texts in High-Stakes Tests: Where are the Benchmarks?

Author

Listed:
  • Tan Jin

    (Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China)

  • Kai Guo

    (Northeastern University, Shenyang, China)

  • Barley Mak

    (The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Qiuping Wu

    (Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China)

Abstract

In language testing literature, the lexical profiles issue has been extensively discussed when examining the quality of reading texts in high-stakes tests. The interpretation and use of lexical profiles, however, have been lacking a point of reference (i.e., benchmarks). Therefore, this study attempts to establish benchmarks for lexical profiles of reading texts in a high-stakes test in China – the National Matriculation English Test (NMET). To elicit sufficient samples, a corpus of 909 NMET reading texts was constructed. Based on the corpus, two stages were employed. Firstly, the 909 texts were screened through a text coverage analysis and representative text samples were selected. Secondly, two sets of benchmarks were established based on the text samples. Overall, this study contributes empirical evidence to evaluating the lexical profiles of NMET reading texts, and has practical implications for developing reading texts in high-stakes tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Tan Jin & Kai Guo & Barley Mak & Qiuping Wu, 2017. "Lexical Profiles of Reading Texts in High-Stakes Tests: Where are the Benchmarks?," International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), IGI Global, vol. 7(1), pages 34-49, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jcallt:v:7:y:2017:i:1:p:34-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJCALLT.2017010103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jcallt:v:7:y:2017:i:1:p:34-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.