IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jcallt/v14y2024i1p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Chinese University EFL Learners' Perceptions of AI in English Writing

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaozhi Liang

    (Shanghai International Studies University, China)

  • Fang Huang

    (Shanghai International Studies University, China)

  • Timothy Teo

    (The Chinese University of Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is useful to English as a foreign language (EFL) learners, but there is a paucity of research on how they perceive AI. Contextualized in a Chinese university setting, this study investigated Chinese university EFL learners' perceptions of Grammarly in English writing. Based on an extended technology acceptance model (TAM) with task relevance, subjective norm, and perceived enjoyment being added, quantitative data were collected from 140 Chinese EFL learners. Structural equation modeling analysis suggested that the proposed model could effectively explain participants' views of Grammarly. Their perceptions of ease of use significantly influenced usefulness, which had a major impact on their attitudes towards AI and behavioral intention. Perceived enjoyment and task relevance were also significant predictors of students' perceptions of this software. The research model explained 71% of the variance of EFL learners' intentions to use AI. Suggestions were given to teachers on implementing AI writing support.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaozhi Liang & Fang Huang & Timothy Teo, 2024. "Understanding Chinese University EFL Learners' Perceptions of AI in English Writing," International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), IGI Global, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jcallt:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:1-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJCALLT.358918
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jcallt:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.