IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jcallt/v12y2022i4p1-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ESL Learners' Processes and Perceptions of Using Google Docs in Collaborative Academic Writing

Author

Listed:
  • Azlin Zaiti Zainal

    (Universiti Malaya, Malaysia)

  • Ma Fei Fan

    (Universiti Malaya, Malaysia)

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the processes of learners' collaborative writing using Google Docs and their perceptions of the collaborative process. Twenty-four undergraduate ESL learners undertaking an academic writing course participated in this study. They were tasked with a paired writing assignment as part of the coursework. Google Docs was used by each pair in revising their drafts before they submitted the final version of their academic essay. Adopting a mixed-methods approach, the qualitative phase involved conducting a textual analysis based on the drafts that the students prepared. The categories used to analyse the revisions were adapted from Kessler et al.'s (2012) analytical categories to understand the focus of learners' revisions. Students' responses to an online survey administered at the end of the course formed the quantitative data. The findings provide insights into the processes of collaborative online writing and students' perceived usefulness of Google Docs as a tool for collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Azlin Zaiti Zainal & Ma Fei Fan, 2022. "ESL Learners' Processes and Perceptions of Using Google Docs in Collaborative Academic Writing," International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), IGI Global, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jcallt:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:1-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJCALLT.310077
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jcallt:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:1-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.