IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jcac00/v12y2022i1p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Impact of Cryptographic Algorithms on Network Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Asare

    (University of Ghana, Ghana)

  • Winfred Yaokumah

    (University of Ghana, Ghana)

  • Ernest Barfo Boadi Gyebi

    (University of Ghana, Ghana)

  • Jamal-Deen Abdulai

    (University of Ghana, Ghana)

Abstract

Cryptographic algorithms enable secure data communication over public insecure networks. Though they enhance network security, complex cryptographic operations consume substantial amounts of computing resources, introducing significant network overhead costs. This study aims to find the cryptographic algorithm that can efficiently utilize network resources. The study evaluates three cryptographic algorithms with different file formats on varying numbers of node densities. The NS-3 simulator was used to measure latency, data throughput, end-to-end delay, packet delivery ratio, and packet loss of files in text, image, and audio formats. The results find AES as better than DES and 3DES for a large number of node densities for the three file formats in terms of latency, data throughput, end-to-end delay, and packet delivery ratio. However, DES has the lowest packet loss as AES records the highest packet loss. The findings provide researchers avenues for further research and the practitioners the choice of suitable algorithms based on the overhead performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Asare & Winfred Yaokumah & Ernest Barfo Boadi Gyebi & Jamal-Deen Abdulai, 2022. "Evaluating the Impact of Cryptographic Algorithms on Network Performance," International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing (IJCAC), IGI Global, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jcac00:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:1-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJCAC.309937
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jcac00:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.