Author
Listed:
- Gulsah Hancerliogullari Koksalmis
(Industrial Engineering Department, Management Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey)
- Cuneyt Calisir
(Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey)
- Murat Durucu
(Industrial Engineering Department, Management Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey)
- Fethi Calisir
(Industrial Engineering Department, Management Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey)
Abstract
This article describes how magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems play a crucial role in radiology, specifically in the diagnosis of diseases and management of patient treatment. The objective of this article is to present MRI technicians' perspective on the relative importance of the required factors when selecting and purchasing an MRI system. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology was used to determine the relative priorities for different criteria along with the consistency of responses. A set of criteria for MRI system were identified based on the literature and interviews with experts (i.e., MRI technicians), and organized into a rational hierarchical framework consisting of the five main criteria and nineteen sub-criteria. An online survey including demographic questions was conducted to identify the relative weights of these criteria. Survey responses from 87 technicians indicate that brand is found to be the most important criteria, followed by patient comfort, usability, technical issues, and performance. Among the sub-criteria, the highest weights are assessed for country of origin, user-friendly independent workstation, reputation, software support. The findings demonstrate the factors that can be critical discriminators between different MRI systems.
Suggested Citation
Gulsah Hancerliogullari Koksalmis & Cuneyt Calisir & Murat Durucu & Fethi Calisir, 2018.
"Selecting an MRI System: A Multi Criteria Decision Making Model for MRI Technicians,"
International Journal of Business Analytics (IJBAN), IGI Global, vol. 5(3), pages 22-32, July.
Handle:
RePEc:igg:jban00:v:5:y:2018:i:3:p:22-32
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jban00:v:5:y:2018:i:3:p:22-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.