IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jban00/v4y2017i2p20-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utility based Tool to Assess Overall Effectiveness of HRD Instruments

Author

Listed:
  • Dinesh Kumar Khurana

    (International Management Institute, New Delhi, India)

  • P.K. Kapur

    (Amity Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Amity University, Noida, India)

  • Nitin Sachdeva

    (Department of Operational Research, University of Delhi, Delhi, India)

Abstract

Humans practically measure everything in life. For any business, they measure revenue, sales, profits, earning per share, stake holders value and so forth. In HR management they measure staff attrition, cost of training per candidate, rating awarded in performance management system etc. Measurement of Effectiveness of HRD instruments namely training and development, compensation, feedback and coaching, job design, career planning etc. are required for any organization, regardless of size, industry, location or success. In this paper an attempt has been made to analyze prominent HR instruments to determine their individual measure of effectiveness and the Total Expected Utility Measure based on Multiple-Attribute Utility analysis, from both the employees' and employers' view point. To assign relative importance to each HRD instrument, Analytical Hierarchical Process has been used. The methodology adopted was questionnaire, to a random sample of teaching faculty in a large private university in north India. The findings indicate that the total expected utility measure is an important measure and facilitates comparing firms in the same industry, region, size, etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Dinesh Kumar Khurana & P.K. Kapur & Nitin Sachdeva, 2017. "Utility based Tool to Assess Overall Effectiveness of HRD Instruments," International Journal of Business Analytics (IJBAN), IGI Global, vol. 4(2), pages 20-36, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jban00:v:4:y:2017:i:2:p:20-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJBAN.2017040102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jban00:v:4:y:2017:i:2:p:20-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.