Author
Listed:
- Cecilia Ficco
(Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas (Río Cuarto, Argentina). Universidad Nacional de Villa María, Instituto de Ciencias Sociales (Villa María, Argentina))
- Eliana Werbin
(Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas (Córdoba, Argentina). Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Económicas (Córdoba, Argentina))
Abstract
La investigación en torno a relevancia de los activos intangibles para la valoración de las empresas a nivel de los mercados de capitales viene desarrollándose con un sostenido interés, el cual encuentra su plena justificación en el marco del modelo contable actual, donde aún persisten las controversias con relación al tratamiento contable de estos activos. En este marco, la presente investigación tiene como propósito revisar la literatura empírica que se ha ocupado de examinar su relevancia valorativa, a fin de presentar el estado actual de la investigación en esta temática. Desde el punto de vista metodológico, se ha realizado una investigación descriptiva y de tipo documental, concretada a través de la revisión y análisis de la literatura más significativa producida en las últimas tres décadas en distintos entornos contables. La revisión realizada refleja evidencias sólidas en torno a la existencia de una asociación significativa y positiva entre la cifra global correspondiente a los activos intangibles y el valor de mercado de las acciones, como así también entre dicho valor y la partida referida a los activos intangibles identificables. Sin embargo, la evidencia no es del todo concluyente en lo que respecta a la relevancia valorativa de la llave de negocio./ The research stream on the relevance of intangible assets for the valuation of companies at the level of capital markets has been developing with a sustained interest, which finds its full justification in the current accounting model, where controversies on the accounting treatment of these assets still persist. In this context, the present research aims to review the empirical literature that has examined the value relevance of intangible assets, in order to present the current state of research in this area. From the methodological point of view, a descriptive and documentary investigation has been carried out, concretized through the review and analysis of the most significant literature produced in the last three decades and in different accounting environments. The review reflects strong evidence regarding the existence of a significant and positive association between the global figure corresponding to intangible assets and the market value of companies shares, as well as between that value and the item referred to identifiable intangible assets. However, the evidence is not entirely conclusive regarding the value relevance of goodwill. It is also noted that most of the studies have been carried out on capital markets with an important degree of development.
Suggested Citation
Cecilia Ficco & Eliana Werbin, 2017.
"Los Activos Intangibles en la Investigación Contable orientada al Mercado de Capitales: Revisión de la literatura empírica sobre su relevancia para la valoración de las Empresas,"
Revista de Economía y Estadística, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Instituto de Economía y Finanzas, vol. 55(1), pages 7-43, Diciembre.
Handle:
RePEc:ief:reveye:v:55:y:2017:i:1:p:7-43
DOI: 10.55444/2451.7321.2017.v55.n1.28361
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
Activos intangibles;
Relevancia valorativa;
Mercados de capitales;
All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
- E22 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Investment; Capital; Intangible Capital; Capacity
- G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ief:reveye:v:55:y:2017:i:1:p:7-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivan Iturralde (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ieuncar.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.