IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ief/revaec/v33y2023i109p11-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

El Programa Mil Días-Nación en perspectiva comparada con Mil Días-San Miguel a dos años de su sanción

Author

Listed:
  • María Sol González

    (Universidad Austral, Instituto de Ciencias para la Familia. CONICET. Universidad Nacional del Sur, Departamento de Economía (Argentina))

  • María Emma Santos

    (Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur (IIESS), Departamento de Economía Universidad Nacional del Sur-CONICET. (Argentina); Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI), Universidad de Oxford (Reino Unido))

Abstract

Existe una sólida y creciente evidencia empírica de los beneficios a largo plazo de las intervenciones de acompañamiento familiar, cuidados integrales de la salud y estimulación durante los primeros mil días de vida de un niño en situación de extrema vulnerabilidad. En este trabajo se realiza un análisis comparativo entre el programa Mil Días implementado en el Municipio de San Miguel (MILD-SM) desde agosto 2015 y el programa Mil Días Nación (MILD-N) creado en 2020. Encontramos que aunque declarativamente los dos programas comparten los mismos objetivos de promover las habilidades y capacidades de las mujeres embarazadas y los niños/as, operativamente, difieren sustancialmente en los instrumentos de intervención en curso hasta el momento. Mientras que MILD-SM implementó visitas familiares con un enfoque interdisciplinario y multidimensional desde el principio, MILD-N, hasta el momento, ha utilizado casi exclusivamente las transferencias monetarias. / There is solid and growing empirical evidence on the long run benefits of interventions through home-visits, comprehensive health care and stimulation during the first thousand days of life of a child in a situation of extreme vulnerability. In this paper we perform a comparative analysis between the Thousand Days program implemented in the Municipality of San Miguel (MilD-SM), Argentina, since August 2015 and the A Thousand Days National program (MilD-N), created in 2020. We find that although declaratively both programs share the same aims of promoting abilities and capacities of pregnant women and children, operationally, they differ substantially in the intervention-instruments in course so far. While A MilD-SM implemented home-visits with an interdisciplinary and multidimensional approach from the very beginning, the MilD-N program, so far, has exclusively used cash transfers.

Suggested Citation

  • María Sol González & María Emma Santos, 2023. "El Programa Mil Días-Nación en perspectiva comparada con Mil Días-San Miguel a dos años de su sanción," Revista Actualidad Económica, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Instituto de Economía y Finanzas, vol. 33(109), pages 11-32, Ene-Abr.
    • Handle: RePEc:ief:revaec:v:33:y:2023:i:109:p:11-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/acteconomica/article/view/41980/42114
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Programa Mil Días; programas para la primera infancia vulnerable; acompañamiento familiar; pobreza; Argentina;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I15 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Economic Development
    • I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ief:revaec:v:33:y:2023:i:109:p:11-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivan Iturralde or Ivan Iturralde (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ieuncar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.