IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/idt/journl/cs9104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of PPIs in the Development of Broadband and the Way Forward: Ghana's Case

Author

Listed:
  • Idongesit WILLIAMS

    (CMI Aalborg University Copenhagen)

  • Daniel M. O. ADJIN

    (CMI Aalborg University Copenhagen)

  • Kenneth K. TSIVOR

    (CMI Aalborg University Copenhagen)

Abstract

Telecom infrastructure development has been enabled greatly by different forms of collaborations or synergies between the public and the private sector. These synergies in most cases are exigent measures employed to enable the diffusion of telecom infrastructure into underserved and un-served areas. This paper examines the role of different public-private interplay that exists in Africa that were aimed at developing telecom infrastructure and why this public-private interplay could help in extending broadband connectivity to rural areas. Ghana is identified as a country with almost 80% penetration of mobile telephony. This has been made possible by the public-private collaborations fostered towards telecom infrastructure development. Ghana is used as a case to examine the strategies and identify possibilities for more of these collaborations. Data was gathered qualitatively. The significance of the paper is to narrate the possibility of using PPP to develop broadband infrastructure in Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Idongesit WILLIAMS & Daniel M. O. ADJIN & Kenneth K. TSIVOR, 2013. "The Impact of PPIs in the Development of Broadband and the Way Forward: Ghana's Case," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(91), pages 81-102, 3rd quart.
    • Handle: RePEc:idt:journl:cs9104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.idate.org/RePEc/idt/journl/CS9104/CS91_WILLIAMS_et_al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruhle, Ernst-Olav & Brusic, Igor & Kittl, Jörg & Ehrler, Matthias, 2011. "Next Generation Access (NGA) supply side interventions—An international comparison," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 794-803.
    2. John Quiggin, 2004. "Risk, PPPs AND THE Public Sector Comparator," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 14(33), pages 51-61, July.
    3. Bourreau, Marc & Cambini, Carlo & Hoernig, Steffen, 2012. "Ex ante regulation and co-investment in the transition to next generation access," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 399-406.
    4. Efraim Sadka, 2006. "Public-Private Partnerships: A Public Economics Perspective," IMF Working Papers 2006/077, International Monetary Fund.
    5. Ragoobar, Tricia & Whalley, Jason & Harle, David, 2011. "Public and private intervention for next-generation access deployment: Possibilities for three European countries," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 827-841.
    6. Falch, Morten & Henten, Anders, 2010. "Public private partnerships as a tool for stimulating investments in broadband," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 496-504, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Evi Steelyana W. & Nur Afiah Nunuy & Dewi Nanny & Wahyuni Ersa Tri & Avianti Ilya, 2024. "Policy Strategies for Public–Private Partnership on Broadband Infrastructure: A Systematic Literature Review," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 1-23.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rendon Schneir, Juan & Xiong, Yupeng, 2016. "A cost study of fixed broadband access networks for rural areas," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(8), pages 755-773.
    2. Díaz, Gonzalo Ruiz, 2022. "Private participation in government-led backbone network projects: Lessons from three Latin American experiments," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8).
    3. Gerli, Paolo & Wainwright, David & Whalley, Jason, 2017. "Infrastructure investment on the margins of the market: The role of niche infrastructure providers in the UK," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 743-756.
    4. Binsfeld, Nico & Whalley, Jason & Pugalis, Lee, 2016. "Competing against yourself: State duopoly in the Luxembourg telecommunications industry," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(8), pages 791-803.
    5. Nucciarelli, Alberto & Castaldo, Angelo & Conte, Elisabetta & Sadowski, Bert, 2013. "Unlocking the potential of Italian broadband: Case studies and policy lessons," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 955-969.
    6. Beltrán, Fernando, 2014. "Fibre-to-the-home, high-speed and national broadband plans: Tales from Down Under," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 715-729.
    7. Howell, Bronwyn & Sadowski, Bert, 2014. "Anatomy of a Public-Private Partnership: Hold-up and regulatory risk in an NGN PPP," 20th ITS Biennial Conference, Rio de Janeiro 2014: The Net and the Internet - Emerging Markets and Policies 106872, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    8. Howell, Bronwyn & Sadowski, Bert, 2018. "Anatomy of a public-private partnership: Hold-up and regulatory commitment in Ultrafast Broadband," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(7), pages 552-565.
    9. Tselekounis, Markos & Varoutas, Dimitris & Martakos, Drakoulis, 2014. "A CDS approach to induce facilities-based competition over NGA networks," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 311-331.
    10. Fernando BELTRÁN, 2013. "Effectiveness and Efficiency in the Build-Up of High-Speed Broadband Platforms in Australia and New Zealand," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(91), pages 35-55, 3rd quart.
    11. Geddes, R. Richard & Wagner, Benjamin L., 2013. "Why do U.S. states adopt public–private partnership enabling legislation?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 30-41.
    12. Gómez-Torres, Lina-María & Beltrán, Fernando, 2011. "Analysis of an integrated plan for expanding broadband access in Colombia," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 871-882.
    13. Bauer, Johannes M., 2014. "Platforms, systems competition, and innovation: Reassessing the foundations of communications policy," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 662-673.
    14. Hrovatin, Nevenka & Švigelj, Matej, 2013. "The interplay of regulation and other drivers of NGN deployment: A real-world perspective," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 836-848.
    15. Parcu, Pier Luigi & Silvestri, Virginia, 2013. "Electronic communications regulation in Europe: An overview of past and future problems," 24th European Regional ITS Conference, Florence 2013 88509, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    16. Pedro Jucá Maciel, 2008. "Public investment or public-private partnership? A decision rule based on indiference curve of public ineficency and private risk premium," Anais do XXXVI Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 36th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 200807211141020, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    17. Liu, Chun, 2017. "An evaluation of China's evolving broadband policy: An ecosystem’s perspective," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 1-11.
    18. Timothy C. Irwin, 2015. "Defining The Government'S Debt And Deficit," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 711-732, September.
    19. Sfakianakis, Emmanouil & Laar, Mindel van de, 2012. "Assessing contingent liabilities in public‐private partnerships (PPPs)," MERIT Working Papers 2012-030, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    20. Lee, Hyeongjik & Jeong, Seonkoo & Lee, Kwanghee, 2020. "Developing the Method for Estimating the Costs of Providing Broadband Universal Service: Korean Case," ITS Conference, Online Event 2020 224865, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public private interplay; broadband; Ghana; Africa; developing countries.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H00 - Public Economics - - General - - - General
    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance
    • O2 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idt:journl:cs9104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: BLAVIER Thomas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/idatefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.